Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/02/10
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]> I do recall that the bench test of the Noctilux caused a dilema > > for the reviewers because many of the mid-aperture resolution > > and contrast measurements did not reach the magazine's minimum > > performance criteria. > From Modern Photography's '79 Photo Buying Guide: The suitability of the noctilux for general usage has been questioned before. When I bought my noctilux four months ago I decided to hang on to my summicron until I was confident in the noctilux. I was worried about comments on the LUG and elsewhere about stopped down performance being inferior to the other 50s. After four months of picture taking at all apertures, all reservations on optical performance have been swept away and I have many pics I wouldnt have believed possible before, mostly B&W but some by available artificial light in colour with blue filter. As a final check before selling the summicron (I'd promised my long suffering wife I wouldn't keep both) I did some back to back tripod-mounted testing of summicron vs noctilux using 400CN at 200asa. I photographed a resolution chart which has lines printed at varying contrast, at close range (5 ft) and also shots of leafless trees against the sky at c50 ft.( there was no wind). I examined the negs with a 15x lupe on a lightbox. In the close range tests I could not distinguish any difference at any aperture from f2 to f16. In the tree shots the noctilux was superior to the summicron at the tested apertures of F 2 and 2.8, the thin twigs being clearly sharper. I realise these are very crude and subjective tests with many many lens characteristics unevaluated, but it does really make me wonder about the Modern Photography test above. The story isn't quite over. I've sold my summicron but I find I'm not completely happy with the noctilux alone. I keep running into the close focus limit and the lens plus hood (built in) do block an awful lot of viewfinder.The large travel of the focussing ring does slow it up in quick response situations. I'm seriously considering a late summilux with built in hood and ,7m close focussing. Any comments or advice? Mike