Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/01/30
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]In a message dated 98-01-30 00:22:10 EST, you write: Ferdinand, I would go with the 24 mm lens. It's just a personal opinion, but I find the perspective of 21 mm lenses too extreme. I am always aware that this is a "wide angle" view when looking at a photo produced with 21 mm lenses. My goal is to always have the technique remain invisible so that the image can be regarded in tis own terms. Actually, both are great lenses, and you really can't go far wrong whatever choice you make. Why not take one of each. After all, the difference between the 21 and 24 is about 14%. That is about the same as the 15% difference between the 35 and 50 mm lenses. Have a good trip, Joe Stephenson