Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/01/24
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]On various occasions there were mentions on this list of scratched lenses which could be restored to as new condition, but this was not considered an economically feasible solution. Let's forget about the cost for a moment! What I do not understand with this procedure is, how can a lens be restored to as new condition photographically (not cosmetically), when repolishing alters the lens' geometry. Factory tolerances when grinding lenses are in the order of .001mm or so. A scratch on the front or back surface of a used lens can easily be of the same order of magnitude, if not more. To grind (polish) it away, you have to take away that much glass from the whole lens surface (not just locally). That means that the geometry (thickness) of the lens and thus the path of the light rays through it are altered. Since the damaged lens surface is usually up front, this alteration changes (if ever so slightly) the path of the light rays through the folloing lenses in a multielement lens as well. How does all this affect photographic quality? Does it only translate into a slight shift of focus for which the lens is then adjusted (e.g. the polished element shimmed) or is there more to it? I am not an optical expert but somebody on the list might be. Can he help? Andras Iklody-Szabo Caracas / Venezuela