Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1997/11/11

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: Opinions Sought: 35mm Summicron R vs M aspheric
From: chris@chrismorrow.com (Christoper Morrow)
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 1997 12:02:45 -0500

At 8:10 AM -0600 on 11/11/97, Eric Welch wrote:

> At 01:48 AM 11/11/97 -0500, you wrote:
>
> >What are the imaging differences between the 35mm Summicron R vs the new M
> >Aspheric?
>
> The new ASPH lenses are going to be quite a bit better than the 35
> Summicron R. In tests that I've seen, the 35 Summicron R is behind not only
> the 35 Summilux R, but also the Canon 35 f/2, and the Contax 35mm 1.4 and
> the non ASPH Summicron M.
>
> That being said, the 35mm Summicron R is supposed to have very high
> resistance to flare, which is an important characteristic. And it's quite a
> bit less expensive than the Summilux, and it does focus closer. But my
> choice on the R cameras would be the Summilux anyway. It's amazing.
>
> I've recently chosen the M Summilux ASPH because I want the focusing
> accuracy of the M6 and the size and weight difference is significant as I
> move into middle age. :-)
>
> I just got a job promotion, to photo editor, so I'm selling all my Nikons
> now and buying a Leica R8. I'm no longer going digital this year, since our
> night photographer has to be the first one to go digital. (Sports and
> deadlines for a morning paper). And I won't be shooting a lot of sports, so
> I don't need AF any more. I'm putting my money where my mouth is, and going
> back to Leica R for my longer lenses.
> ==========
>
> Eric Welch
> St. Joseph, MO
> http://www.ponyexpress.net/~ewelch
>


Eric,

Congrats on your promotion. Beats lugging all that equipment around,
doesn't it?

Chris


- -----------------
Christopher Morrow
Christopher Morrow Photography		Canandaigua, NY
716.394.8810 phone			716.394.4953 fax
http://www.chrismorrow.com

- -----------------