Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1997/11/11
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]WARNING: This may be a long missive and those not into Previsualization Issues in Imaging had better move on: BACKGROUND: The matter of previsualization skills, going into the moment of image capture, has inerested me for sometime. ( I sent a manuscript to OUTDOOR PHOTOGAPHY, I think it was, about a year ago which was rejected!). I'm still fine tuning that manuscript and if anyone knows a publisher that might be interested in "my story, my stuff" on previsualization; why, then, let me know! THESIS: Previsualization behavior exists at both conscious and unconscious levels. It is my view that we enter into a dialogue with ourselves in the run up to image capture, no matter the media: from oil canvas to Kodachrome 64! We are all "locked in" approching that moment whether we like it or not. We must value spontaneity, decisiveness, and quickness of action; for, much of our subject matters demands nothing less! Sir Francis Bacon has aid that "knowledge is power". Kierkegard (Sp?) wisely added that "knoweldge is power only when it comes alive within us"! I agree. NOTE: While it is well and good to value spontaneity and avoid the stiff and stilted bias of being "locked in" the tension between these two anchor positions is resolved by the expedient of "planned spontaneity". DEFINITION: "Planned Spontaneity" is the learning curve whereby through discipline, practice and experimentation we hone new skills. In order to strengthen our previsualization skills (involving emotion, motivation, behavior) we need to study what I call the "structure of previsuaslization" TERMS: STRUCTURE OF PREVISUALIZATION: Herein lies my story, the substance of the rejected manuscript I referred to above. My discussion is both theory and fact and cannot help anyone this month: An intellectual appreciation of this topic, followed by its use in a playful and creative fashion in the field, so to speak, will permit these powerful ideas (re: structure and dynamics of previsualization) to "comes alive within us" in the manner of a "co pilot", acting in the back of our minds, while self talk of various sorts acts in the front of our mind, at the moment of image capture. The long and short of it is we talk to ourselves on at least two levels when shooting pictures; the less conscious level of aesthetic values and the more conscious level of pracical decision making in the moment of image capture that involve our more conscious and habitual premises, criteria and standards for a "good picture". Now a "good picture" is merely a picture that successfully captures your concept of a good picture in that moment: concept fulfillment! The goodness lies in the degree of success you score in producing an image that matches your expectations. Goodness is the successful intersection of expectations and results: "concept fullfillment" Of course the good will have property density: it will be richer in properties than the bad, in crude two-valued-logic! CONCLUSION: Previsualization behavior ought to concern all of us image makers and especially those of us who invest in high quality, high tech hardware. It is an opportunity to get into the development of high tech softward (cognitive mental processes, inner dialogues with ourselves in the run up to image capture, high quality, spontaneous image capture decisions etc.). Working on our relationship to composition issues, lighting issues, etc. using a higher previsualization consciousness (which can be learned) is only common sense. While learning this high tech cognitive technology, to match our hight tech Leica technology and aspiration, is only uncommon, common sense, in my view! As you can see I'm in the middle of a manuscript on developinging imaging skills that is a bit high tech and until it comes alive within us through personal growth with it, practice with it, etc. it will seem abstract and too difficult.. But, then, we all enjoy behaviors that were hard won through just such discipline, practice, and drill. In time any deliberately acquired skill becomes spontaneous and of the more properties the skill possesses the greater the pleasure! I enjoy my touch typing skill enormously, and have ever since I labored tediously in High School to learn it! During the moment of drill and learning we are engaged in what I call "planned spontaneity", an investment in tomorrow's familar spontaneity. There are many who resist learning new skills and will stand pat and that' ok. Hopefully not everyone will stand pat against the merits of , and new thinking surrounding the development of previsualization behavior and skills! This is merely a new direction for personal growth having profound implications for all image makers. Remember: High tech cameras without high tech inner dialogues with ourselves is a match up that will only become a mix up! I apologize for the length of this LUG missive; but., along with Laboradore Retrievers, Bee Keeping, Lecia Cameras, and Lenses I will have a tendency to mouth off. I hope f my more sympathetic readers will feel free to offer feedback. Perhaps this is off topic stuff; but, then, I'll let the LUG make that call. As for the others, I've warened them up front. There is an old saying that while I have no formula for success, I have a formula for failure and that is to attempt to please everyone! Impossibl;e? This is touched typed without editing and I'm sending it without re-reading based on the fact that I writing a book on this stuff. My core premise is that people don't have values they are their values and that good imaging is a magger of habitual evaluative habits and that there is a structure to such things. I'm applying my science to imaging and having writen many words on this subject, these words come easily. I trust they will make sense to some, but not all. Disclaimer: There is no Laboradore Retriever with his nose on my keyboard; although, am, hoping to find a couple Labs in '98 and we all need all the help we can't get! Leon LP6@aol.com