Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1997/09/21
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]To whom the originator of this post: <<<< Has anybody ever used a lens longer than 135mm on the M3 without a > Visoflex? Perchance, I'm having to do a fair amount of sports > shooting, and a 135mm isn't long enough.>>>>>> Don't waste your time and money trying to shoot sports with the rangefinder Leica, no matter how much you love it. It will only beget you missed peak action, images that are still too small and frame after frame of complete frustration. It also depends on what sports you are shooting. Advice from a long time Leica user/sports photographer, (Olympics, Commonwealth, Pan American and national sports) either buy a Leica SLR, motor drive and the 280 2.8 along with two extenders, 1.4 & 2X and you pretty well have it made. <<< Of course you have to estimate the distance, but on a sunny day with 400 asa and the subject not too close that is not much of a problem. For me it works very fine.>>>>> Estimating the distance on a fast moving sport must get you an awful lot of missed action! Because if you are shooting sports there is only one way to do it, even with a 300-400mm lens and that is with the lens wide open---even on sunny days--- and the highest possible shutter speed as this separates the athlete from the background and isolates the action. By estimating with your M camera and a shooting in this fashion is living dangerously and will leave you broken hearted with out of focus frames and or just missed moments. <<the subject not too close that is not much of a problem>>> That is why we have more than one camera hanging around our necks or shoulders to capture the moment when they are real close with a wide angle or shorter focal length. <<< For me it works very fine>>>>> Not knowing at what level (amateur or professional) you are, it is difficult to give deeper advice, but your above comment implys you might be an amateur, as I don't think a pro would even consider using an M camera with a 400mm lens to shoot sports. However we all started as amateurs and there isn't anything wrong with that, but I'm sure if you were to spend money for any added pieces to your M camera, sooner or later you would be just ticked off at yourself for wasting the money rather than saving to buy an SLR model. An option to consider if the Leica SLR and motor are too expensive is look for a used Canon EOS 1 or 1n and a 300 2.8 Canon lens with extenders. It is an admirable product and if I were not so committed to Leica, R7, R8's, M6's etc I would be using Canon. ted