Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1997/09/06
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]While I am not a statistician, I use statistics frequently. All of the comments about sampling, confidence intervals and the like are certainly relevant, but not the whole story. There is a big difference between being able to say precisely that 26.5% of all M6s have some sort of defect and that something does not smell quite right in the state of Denmark. I certainly would like an M6, but spending the $1900 or so a new one would cost would be a big step for me. While perfect quality control exists only in one's imagination, defects should be very few and far between in Leica production. A defect rate of 10% or even 5% is much too high for Leica, given the cost of the camera. Furthermore, they have been doing this for a while; the data are not for the first few models of a new run. If you pull a few marbles out of a big jar that is supposed to contain only white marbles and the three of the first six are red, you certainly cannot say with any certainty that 50% of the marbles in the jar are red. You do know, however, that there are red marbles where none should be. Moral; don't throw the baby out with the bath water. There is a reasonable chance that there are problems with recent production that exceed what we have a right to expect as "normal" under the circumstances. Steve