Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1997/09/03
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]- --IMA.Boundary.555803378 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Description: cc:Mail note part Steven & group, here's my survey 2 cents I have had (recently) 4 m6's, 28/2.8, 35/2, 35/1.4 asph, 50/2, 75/1.4, 90/2, plus m4-p Problems 2x brand new m6 bodies had frame counter problems (one chrome, one titanium). On one of these bodies (the chrome one) the rewind lever also fell off in the first week. The brand new 50/2 had a pubic hair in between the elements. The brand new 90/2 had the wrong lens mount. The frame lines on the used m4-p requied Don Goldberg's attention twice in 2 weeks to function correctly. Mean time to repair for all brand new items was 4 weeks 1 day. Don Goldberg MTTR was 2 days. For the thousands of dollars invested, I don't think this is good, from either a product quality or service quality perspective. What's good? A battery cover fell off, and under passport, Nils Thorsen only took 2.5 weeks to get me 2 new ones! Alistair ______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________ Subject: Re: M6 problem "survey" Author: "Steven L. Alexander" <alexpix@worldnet.att.net> at Internet Date: 9/3/97 8:52 AM I have two M6's one older 161xxxx and newer(bought new)191xxxx and they have not had failure of counter or rf alignment and are used daily and hard. Add this to your survey data and also those who haven't had problems join in and add our good news. Steven Alexander - --IMA.Boundary.555803378 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; name="RFC822 message headers" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Description: cc:Mail note part Content-Disposition: inline; filename="RFC822 message headers" Received: from ns2.baxter.com (159.198.1.38) by ccmailgw.mcgawpark.baxter.com with SMTP (IMA Internet Exchange 2.1 Enterprise) id 001A0D3F; Wed, 3 Sep 97 08:12:33 - -0500 Received: from mejac.palo-alto.ca.us (mejac.palo-alto.ca.us [192.147.236.1]) by ns2.baxter.com (8.8.0/8.8.0) with ESMTP id IAA15995 for <stewara@baxter.com>; Wed, 3 Sep 1997 08:20:30 -0500 (CDT) Received: from by mejac.palo-alto.ca.us (5.65/KJV) id AA14363for stewara@baxter.com; Wed, 3 Sep 97 05:59:10 -0700 Received: from mtigwc03.worldnet.att.net by mejac.palo-alto.ca.us (5.65/KJV) id AA14357for /usr/local/lib/majordomo/wrapper resend -C /usr/local/lib/majordomo/config.mejac/majordomo.cf -l leica-users -h mejac.palo-alto.ca.us leica-users-outgoing@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us; Wed, 3 Sep 97 05:59:06 -0700 Received: from default ([207.116.130.6]) by mtigwc03.worldnet.att.net (post.office MTA v2.0 0613 ) with ESMTP id AAA14908 for <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>; Wed, 3 Sep 1997 12:59:04 +0000 From: "Steven L. Alexander" <alexpix@worldnet.att.net> To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> Subject: Re: M6 problem "survey" Date: Wed, 3 Sep 1997 08:52:59 -0400 X-Msmail-Priority: Normal X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: Microsoft Internet Mail 4.70.1155 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <19970903125903.AAA14908@default> Sender: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us Precedence: bulk Reply-To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us - --IMA.Boundary.555803378--