Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1997/08/06

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: M6 Electronic
From: dbledsoe <boise@compuserve.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Aug 1997 13:01:28 -0400

DG Wrote:

>>An M6E, or even a CLE, if it had a spot meter, an AE lock and a larger =
RF
base would be a perfect camera for me. I could, as I wrote earlier, pick =
my
spot, lock it and frame my photo. All the while saving valuable seconds
over a photographer using a manual camera.<<

My experience leads me to differ with this statement (the part about savi=
ng
valuable seconds over a photographer with a manual camera).  I have an M2=
,
an M6, and a couple of other brand cameras with AE and exposure lock.  Th=
e
one most easily put to use, and the quickest for me, is the M2 (cameras
don't get much more "manual" than that).  The auto exposure system for my=

M2 is me.  While wandering around I now have the habit of estimating
exposure of scenes that look interesting.  As a matter of habit I carry t=
he
M2 and with a selected shutter speed approriate to my surroundings (in
anticipation of something presenting itself).  I change the selected
shutter speed frequently as lighting changes or as action picks up or slo=
ws
down.  I do this not prior to taking a photograph, rather I do it as I
wander around.  From there, should a photo present itself, it is a simple=

matter to adjust by feel where the aperture setting I want should be for
the exposure my internal meter (my brain) tells me is needed.  I can do
this as I am bringing the camera up to eye level, and do so  without
actually looking at the aperture setting.   Once at eye level I do a quic=
k
focus (if necessary) and shoot.  Most often I have found that being close=

on focus is sufficient unless shooting wide open, in close.

This system takes practice (I am not 100% yet but am getting better at it=

as each day passes).  As I get better at this approach I find that I can
(in terms of speed) get the shot quicker than I can with my other cameras=

should if I take time to meter per the cameras internal meter system.  Th=
is
is especially so if I need to expose for some other part of the scene, lo=
ck
the exposure (when using a camera with AE lock), reframe, focus and shoot=
=2E =

The other advantage I find with this system is that the less time my came=
ra
is at eye level the less likely it is that people are aware they are bein=
g
photographed.  I have a better chance of catching them in natural
expression or activity.   People seem to react differently when they know=

they are being photgraphed (my mother is the worst offender I have
experienced.  She's quite photogenic as herself but will always put on th=
e
same stupid looking forced smile when she is aware of being photographed)=
=2E =

  =


I prefer to take advantage of the wider latitude of print films. =

Improvements in print film in the last 5 years have been significant.  I
can't help but feel that those who shoot only chrome are missing some
advantages of the progress made.

It works for me.

best, Don  =