Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1996/10/05

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us, leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
Subject: Re: Hmm Great new question - AGE
From: "Roger L. Beamon" <beamon@primenet.com>
Date: Sat, 5 Oct 1996 12:20:04 -0700 (MST)

>New question for the group.
>
>Just how old are we? It is understandable that possibly the average age of a
>Leica user or collector is somewhat older than say the Nikon, etc. user for
>it takes a higher income or greater assets to acquire a $2,000.00 lens than
>a $200.00 lens.
>
>I don't think of myself as old, stodgy, well heeled or grouchy. At 48, I'm
>just hitting my stride. My 9 year old son does agree with your statement,
>though and thinks that in the interest of estate planning, I should turn
>over my Leica system to him NOW. If I do, does that make him old, stodgy,
>well heeled and grouchy.
>Brian Levy, J.D.
>Toronto, Ont.
>dlevy@worldy.com

You *are* just a pup Brian. Maybe we can start a mini poll here. Speaking
for myself, I *am* getting along, 61 in December (head of a 25 year old,
though), not particularly stodgy, able to enjoy an early retirement, but
definitely grouchy!
--
Roger Beamon,  Naturalist & Photographer
                          Docent:  Arizona-Sonora Desert Museum
                          Leica Historical Society Of America
                          INTERNET:  beamon@primenet.com	


Replies: Reply from dwp@deltanet.com (Re: Hmm Great new question - AGE)