Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1996/10/05

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
Subject: Hmm Great new question - AGE
From: dlevy@worldy.com
Date: Sat, 5 Oct 1996 12:24:43 -0400

At 08:59  04/10/96 -0700, you wrote:


>Leicaphiles have a reputation for being the stodgy, old, well heeled
>grouches of the camera enthusiasts, 

>--
>Roger Beamon,  Naturalist & Photographer
>                          Docent:  Arizona-Sonora Desert Museum
>                          Leica Historical Society Of America
>                          INTERNET:  beamon@primenet.com	
>
New question for the group.

Just how old are we? It is understandable that possibly the average age of a
Leica user or collector is somewhat older than say the Nikon, etc. user for
it takes a higher income or greater assets to acquire a $2,000.00 lens than
a $200.00 lens.

I don't think of myself as old, stodgy, well heeled or grouchy. At 48, I'm
just hitting my stride. My 9 year old son does agree with your statement,
though and thinks that in the interest of estate planning, I should turn
over my Leica system to him NOW. If I do, does that make him old, stodgy,
well heeled and grouchy.
Brian Levy, J.D.
Toronto, Ont.
dlevy@worldy.com


Replies: Reply from cdhoover@pacbell.net (Re: Hmm Great new question - AGE)
Reply from "Glenn Wm. Thrall" <gthrall@ix.netcom.com> (Re: Hmm Great new question - AGE)
Reply from "joe b." <joe-b@dircon.co.uk> (Re: Hmm Great new question - AGE)