Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1996/09/25
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]At 11:18 24/09/96 -0400, you wrote: >Eric (Welch), > >Then both Newton and I are both off the wall, because I use a Leica CL with >the 40mm in my mix of equipment. The combo never disappointed me. It permits >me to travel light with professional equipment and results. > >I have a gut feeling that compact professional RFs will become staples. Sure, >the CL bears the Leica rebarbative nature re loading because of its take up >spool and separate back, but it's a lot easier to handle than the M's. I can >work very fast with it now. But this little blackbird can fly! > >Bob Rosen > Make that 3 votes for the venerable CL. Its is my main travel camera and backup for my ETRS. With the 40 and 90mm lenses, a flash, filters, etc., and Minox tripod I have a system which I can wear on my belt. I can't seem to do that with a Minolta 400si system I recently acquired. The dimensions are good (compare it to the G-1 for a small surprise). Admittedly, the removable back takes some time to get used to and I wish it had the 3 lug system of the later M5. For those who disagree, I'll buy yours for $50.00. Brian Levy, J.D. Toronto, Ont. dlevy@worldy.com