Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1996/09/25
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]At 10:56 24/09/96 -0700, you wrote: >At 11:18 AM 9/24/96 -0400, you wrote: >>Eric (Welch), >> >>Then both Newton and I are both off the wall, because I use a Leica CL with >>the 40mm in my mix of equipment. The combo never disappointed me. It permits >>me to travel light with professional equipment and results. > >Well, I'm sure Newton's smartest move was to own a CL. I never said >anything to denigrate the CL, did I? The G1/2 and their ilk are not pro >cameras, in the same class as the M6, and neither is the CL and relatives. >In my opinoion, note. My boss has a CL too and loves it. But they are not >my cup of tea. My hands are rather large, and doesn't like such tiny little >cameras. But then I used to love lugging around my 280 2.8 Apo Telyt! <g> >It was such an awesome piece of glass. > >=========== >Eric Welch >Grants Pass, OR > >Analogies in writing are like feathers on a snake. > What is a "'pro' camera"? I have seen and read articles for years which site this, but I have not seen a uniform definition of the term. Brian Levy, J.D. Toronto, Ont. dlevy@worldy.com