Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1996/07/22
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]> Besides, Leica has spun off from Leitz, and I don't care what they choose to > include under the name's umbrella, just make the cameras and lenses as good > or better than previously. If there was a camera that I perceived as better > than a Leica, I'd buy it - even if it was a "Fortunko"! This reminds me of a great story, that I have to tell, despite not being directly Leica related, or related to this subject. My father used to work in Public Relations (for the IRS if you can believe that) and came in to contact with the press quite often. He had a relationship with a news photographer from a major Philadelphia newspaper. This photographer, whose name was Gottlieb, was always complaining that the other news photographers had great cameras like Leicas, Nikons, Canons and the like while he never got any respect because all his paper would issue him was a $79 (at that time) Yashica 124. Once, when complaining to the people at the paper's machine shop, they took pity on him and told him to give them the camera for the afternoon. When he got it back, the Yashica nameplate was gone and had been replaced by a hand crafted nameplate that read "Beilttog" (which was "Gottlieb" backwards.) >From then on he felt that he had the most unique camera in the Philadelphia press corps and often had other photographers showing interest in his camera and wanting to know "What is a Beilttog?". --Jim Dempsey-- jjd@bbn.com http://frontdoor.bbn.com/users/jjd