Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1996/04/11

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
Subject: Re: CLE vs. Leica
From: "joe b." <joe@azurite.demon.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 1996 20:41:01 +0100

In message <199604111639.JAA23564@dfw-ix4.ix.netcom.com>, Stephen Gandy
<cameras@ix.netcom.com> writes
>It's the currently the only way  to get aperture priority automation
>with Leica lenses.  It has an accurate electronic shutter and
>metering system which..alas..does not work when the batteries 
>die.   It's only design fault is that the meter does not
>function when the camera is switched off AE priority.

Am I right in thinking that the CLE has no exposure lock or exposure
compensation facility? If so, wouldn't this make getting accurate
exposures on slide film a bit difficult?
-- 
joe b.

Replies: Reply from Eric Welch <ewelch@gp.magick.net> (Re: CLE vs. Leica)
In reply to: Message from cameras@ix.netcom.com (Stephen Gandy) (Re: CLE vs. Leica)