[Leica] More with the Leica II

[Nathan Wajsman]

I like both “no title” very much. And the old lens certainly does well!

Un abrazo,
Nathan

Nathan Wajsman

Alicante, Spain
http://www.frozenlight.eu <http://www.frozenlight.eu/>
http:// <http://www.greatpix.eu/>www.greatpix.eu
PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws <http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws>Blog: http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/ <http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/>

Cycling: http://www.crazyguyonabike.com/belgiangator <http://www.crazyguyonabike.com/belgiangator>

YNWA

"I’m not arguing, I’m just explaining why I’m right"












> On 13 May 2021, at 13:23, Lluis Ripoll via LUG <lug at leica-users.org> wrote:
> 
> These are the last ones I’ll share with the Leica II, film was Kentmere 100. The two las was to test the lens (Elmar f 3.5  5cm) in backlight without lenshood
> 
> No title 1
> <http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/Barcelona/2021F050110.jpg.html>
> 
> No Title 2
> <http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/Barcelona/2021F050114.jpg.html>
> 
> Wall (This one was wide open and focus on the flowers)
> <http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/Barcelona/2021F050117.jpg.html>
> 
> Testing a strong backlight from the shadow side without lenshood
> <http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/Barcelona/2021F050126.jpg.html>
> 
> Testing backlight from the shadow side (more protected) without lenshood
> <http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/Barcelona/2021F050127.jpg.html> 
> 
> Thanks for looking, your c&c are welcome
> 
> Saludos cordiales
> Lluis
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information