[Leica] Uluru 2

[Nathan Wajsman]

The moving abstracts are not bad but I still prefer the straight shot—impressive!

Cheers,
Nathan

Nathan Wajsman

Alicante, Spain
http://www.frozenlight.eu <http://www.frozenlight.eu/>
http:// <http://www.greatpix.eu/>www.greatpix.eu
PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws <http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws>Blog: http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/ <http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/>

Cycling: http://www.crazyguyonabike.com/belgiangator <http://www.crazyguyonabike.com/belgiangator>

YNWA

"I’m not arguing, I’m just explaining why I’m right"












> On 2 Feb 2020, at 13:56, Jayanand Govindaraj via LUG <lug at leica-users.org> wrote:
> 
> The second installment of Uluru photographs comes from a gigantic art
> installation called the Field of Dreams, which is acres of open land
> densely packed with LED bulbs of various colours. It switched on at dusk,
> and switched off at dawn. Unfortunately, no tripods are allowed into the
> area, or in the viewing galleries. Because of this, and the fact that
> descending darkness forced high exposure times, I decided to experiment by
> moving the camera around during exposure. I am a fan of the Abstract
> Expressionist school of painting, and this method, to me, seemed to
> duplicate the spontaneity in creation that the group believed in.
> 
> 
> 
> As dusk fell the lights were switched on, and this is the straight shot:
> 
> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/jayanand/auatralia/uluru/Australia-20200116-723.jpg.html
>