[Leica] Fomapan 400 film

[Nathan Wajsman]

I have similar experiences. It is not a bad film (made in the Czech Republic), but it is on the grainy side.

Cheers,
Nathan

Nathan Wajsman

Alicante, Spain
http://www.frozenlight.eu <http://www.frozenlight.eu/>
http:// <http://www.greatpix.eu/>www.greatpix.eu
PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws <http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws>Blog: http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/ <http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/>

Cycling: http://www.crazyguyonabike.com/belgiangator <http://www.crazyguyonabike.com/belgiangator>

YNWA













> On 9 Aug 2019, at 08:20, Christopher Crawford <chris at chriscrawfordphoto.com> wrote:
> 
> I tried it years ago. It has nice tonality but it is grainy compared to Tri-X or HP-5. The only truly bad thing about it is that it has a weak anti-halation layer, so there's a lot of flare visible around transitions between dark and light objects.
> 
> D-76 1+1 gave me the best results.
> 
> 
> -- 
> Chris Crawford
> Fine Art Photography
> Fort Wayne, Indiana
> 260-437-8990
> 
> http://www.chriscrawfordphoto.com  My portfolio
> 
> http://www.facebook.com/pages/Christopher-Crawford/48229272798
> Like My Work on Facebook
> 
> 
> On 8/9/19, 2:02 AM, "LUG on behalf of Dan Khong via LUG" <lug-bounces+chris=chriscrawfordphoto.com at leica-users.org on behalf of lug at leica-users.org> wrote:
> 
>    Friends
> 
>    I have two rolls of FomaPan 400 film arriving from B&H. I have not used
>    them before and will appreciate some advice from your experiences. Thanks.
> 
>    Dan K.
> 
>    _______________________________________________
>    Leica Users Group.
>    See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information