[Leica] Nikon mirrorless

[Frank Filippone]

Some might remember I have been trying to put together a kit of mirrorless
camera ( tried Fuji, hated that WA lenses were not so wide with an APS-C
sensor, now focused on Sony) and lenses, to weigh almost the minimum
possible, but keep IQ great.

To those that believe the mirrorless is lighter.....  with the caveat that
the sensor is the same size.... 24x36mm
Yes, usually the body is less weight than a DSLR, especially the full pro
models......  ( Sony A7riii vs Nikon 850 / D5 specs: 657g vs 950/1450g)  (
note the Leica M10 is 660g, and the M3 is 610g)
The difference of 300g is about 10 ounces..... 800g is about 1 1/2
pounds....

But a 300mm F4 lens weighs the same..... ditto any other lens you wish to
think about.  The more modern lenses are a bit less heavy, but it is not
because they are for a mirrorless camera....the build technology is
different....

If you put 3 lenses in your bag for the day, ( say a WA zoom like 16-35, a
mid range zoom like a 24-70, and finally a long-ish zoom like a 70-200) the
difference in total weight saved may be 8 ounces to a pound.  In a 8-10
pound total weight bag.  You won't really notice the difference.....

Going from F2.8 lenses to F4 lenses will save you 8-16 ounces PER LENS.  Now
you save some weight, regardless of the technology of the body... mirrorless
or DSLR.   That could add up to 1/3 less total weight.....

Trying to use your existing M lenses on mirrorless cameras will get you
great IQ, but not reduce weight.  It will reduce bulk.  The "cost" is what I
call "user experience".

If you want the minimum weight, lenses and body, switch to a APS-C sensor
camera.  Everything gets lighter.... a lot lighter..... 

Food for thought..... focus on features you want/need.

Frank Filippone

Red735i at verizon.net