[Leica] Decisions!

[Nathan Wajsman]

I would lose the 16-35 and especially the 90-280. If that does not bring you the weight reduction you need, then also the 90/2.

Cheers,
Nathan

Nathan Wajsman

Alicante, Spain
http://www.frozenlight.eu <http://www.frozenlight.eu/>
http:// <http://www.greatpix.eu/>www.greatpix.eu
PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws <http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws>Blog: http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/ <http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/>

Cycling: http://www.crazyguyonabike.com/belgiangator <http://www.crazyguyonabike.com/belgiangator>

YNWA













> On 28 Dec 2018, at 23:31, Tina Manley via LUG <lug at leica-users.org> wrote:
> 
> LUG:
> 
> I'm packing for my trip to Bangladesh.  We are carrying only carry-on
> luggage - one suitcase of clothes (for Tom and me for 5 weeks) and one
> rolling camera bag of equipment.  Part of the trip goes through Beijing and
> we travel on China East Airlines from Beijing to Bangkok.  Everything on
> all of their sites says that any carry-on bag cannot weigh more than 10KG.
> Of course, my camera bag weighs much more.
> 
> I'm taking the SL, 16-35, 24-90, 90-280, 50/1.4, and 90/2.0.  I stuck in
> the M240 and MM with a 24 and 50 mm M lens.  Those don't weigh anything.
> I've almost decided to leave the 50/1.4 and 90/2.0 at home.  Those are the
> heavy ones that I am least likely to use.  I will miss the low-light and
> beautiful depth of field of those two lenses, though. (I will have the M
> 50/1.4 for the M240 and MM)
> 
> What do you think?  We leave early Sunday morning.
> 
> Tina
> 
> 
> -- 
> Tina Manley
> www.tinamanley.com
> tina-manley.artistwebsites.com
> http://www.pbase.com/tinamanley
> <http://www.alamy.com/stock-photography/3B49552F-90A0-4D0A-A11D-2175C937AA91/Tina+Manley.html>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information