[Leica] Fuji vs Sony question

[Philippe]

Just about the fujis.

Only one fuji has in body stabilization the XH x that Howard uses with success btw

OTT, if you happen to shoot video, the fuji is currently the one to beat.

Else, having had and still using the XT series I like its ergonomics and results, the native lenses and the versatility. High ISO is fine by my own standards witht the XT-2, and contrary to AF, the XT-3 is no better in that respect.
What I like less is the changes I’ve had to get used to when processing the files - the curve was long and winding as that famous road … counterintuitive after shooting other brands. But if this is you final choice, feel free to ask for advice.

Ogh yes, the JPEGs are impressive, most of the time.


XT-2 samples 
ISO 6400
http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Phileica/Noir+et+Blanc/Brehm-Cabinet-maker-0823.jpg.html <http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Phileica/Noir+et+Blanc/Brehm-Cabinet-maker-0823.jpg.html>

Colour
http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Phileica/Playground/LPP-11-11-2018-1542.jpg.html <http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Phileica/Playground/LPP-11-11-2018-1542.jpg.html>

Hope this may help you decide

Amities

Philippe



> Le 28 déc. 2018 à 08:19, Aram Langhans via LUG <lug at leica-users.org> a écrit :
> 
> I was wondering what people who have these cameras think of them in comparison to each other.  I am thinking of the Sony a7 MIII and the Fuji Xt series.
> 
> Forget that there is a FF vs crop sensor difference.  I understand that issue.  I am more interested in native optics, stabilization for legacy glass, quality of output as far as color and low light, and EVF.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> Aram
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information