[Leica] Selling for the SL

[Geoff Hopkinson]

Hi Bob (and all) I have the M (Typ 240) and the SL. I have used only the
Summilux M 50 ASPH and the Apo Summicron M 75 ASPH (via adapter) a very
limited amount to try it out.
So my opinions just on your specific questions,
1. None that I am aware of.
2. the native colour rendering from the SL is a little more neutral,  reds
especially 'better'
Bottom line...Not in my opinion , the M sensors are more optimised. I bet
that the differences are very subtle though.

Bonus opinion,  get the SL, it does lots more stuff that the M cannot and
the 24-90 is excellent.




Cheers
Geoff
http://www.pbase.com/hoppyman

, Bob Adler <
> > rgacpa at gmail.com> > wrote:



> Hello all.
>  I'm contemplating selling some gear (M240, M21mm/1,4 ASPH, Sony
>  A7r II  modified by Kolarivision for Leica WA lenses) plus some
> cash for > an SL and  the 24-90. Two questions:



> 1. Given a large collection of recent generation M lenses, are there any
> known issues? MINOR degradation at the corners of images made with WA
> lenses used wide open are not a big deal to me.



> 2. Is there a noticeable positive difference in raw files? What
> differences (positive or negative).  Bottom line, is the image quality, vs
> the M240, significantly improved with M lenses to warrant this
> move? Not really talking about the differences in how one works with the
> two systems.



> Thanks in advance for your input,
>  Bob Adler
>