[Leica] TL2?

[Nathan Wajsman]

Sure, but at the end of the day it is about the image.
The only non-Leica system (in my experience) that has the same image quality is Fuji X. The Leica is slight better at ISO 100 but the Fuji is better at higher ISOs, so it is more flexible and that is why I used it most of the time.

Cheers,
Nathan

Nathan Wajsman
Alicante, Spain
http://www.frozenlight.eu <http://www.frozenlight.eu/>
http:// <http://www.greatpix.eu/>www.greatpix.eu
PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws <http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws>Blog: http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/ <http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/>
Cycling: http://www.crazyguyonabike.com/belgiangator <http://www.crazyguyonabike.com/belgiangator>
YNWA













> On 10 Jul 2017, at 21:10, Frank Filippone <red735i at verizon.net> wrote:
> 
> It's the glass.......
> 
> When you compare Canikon to Leica glass, the differences will astound you.
> 
> Frank Filippone
> 
> Red735i at verizon.net
> 
> 
> What a bunch of rubbish. My 9-year old M8 with its “cropped” sensor delivers better image quality than the “full frame” (whatever that means) Canikons my friends have.
> 
> Nathan Wajsman
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information