[Leica] Leica M10

[Rei Shinozuka]

There exists a nonzero probability of chancing across a ticket on the 
street, or to be gifted a ticket by your great Aunt.  The probability of 
a given person acquiring a winning ticket in this manner versus 
purchasing one in any given lifetime is indistinguishable by any 
practical measure.

Regarding the M10, wouldn't it be the cherry on top if the M10 had an 
M3/4/6 tiny clockwise shutter dial ?  But otherwise, gosh, isn't the M10 
pretty?  For an MP or M3 owner, it stirs the imagination.

-rei


On 01/25/2017 07:43 PM, Aram wrote:
> He means that even with your ticket, your odds are still almost zero. At
> least that is what I think he means.  That is how I take it.
>
> Aram
>
> Aram Langhans
> (Semi) Retired Science Teacher
> & Unemployed photographer
>
> “The Human Genome Project has proved Darwin more right than Darwin himself would ever have dared dream.” James D. Watson
>
> On 1/25/2017 4:32 AM, Piers Hemy wrote:
>> Forgive me, Aram, for I am no mathematician, but I cannot understand how
>> your friend can justify "very slightly". If I buy a ticket, the odds are 1
>> in 1 gazillion, which must (mathematically) be _infinitely_ better than zero
>> in 1 gazillion.
>>
>> What I have misunderstood?
>>
>> Piers
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: LUG [mailto:lug-bounces+piers.hemy=ail.com at leica-users.org] On
>> Behalf Of Aram
>> Sent: 24 January 2017 16:02
>> To: Leica Users Group
>> Subject: Re: [Leica] Leica M10
>>
>> You know, Gerry, as a math teacher friend of mine says, your odds of
>> winning the lottery increase very slightly if you actually buy a ticket.
>>
>>
>> Aram
>>
>> Aram Langhans
>> (Semi) Retired Science Teacher
>> & Unemployed photographer
>>
>> “The Human Genome Project has proved Darwin more right than Darwin himself
>> would ever have dared dream.” James D. Watson
>>
>> On 1/20/2017 10:42 PM, Gerry Walden wrote:
>>> My initial comment was a bit tongue in cheek, but it seems to have started
>> something. In previous models since the M9 I have felt that they are
>> reiterations of the basic concept of a digital full-frame Leica, but I feel
>> this one has gone a step further for some reason.
>>> Let me make it clear there is no way that I will be buying one unless I
>> win the lottery, which is pretty unlikely as I never buy a ticket.
>>> Gerry
>>>
>>>
>>>> On 21 Jan 2017, at 01:46, Frank Filippone <red735i at verizon.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I appreciate your response.... I was ( am?) looking for a reason to like
>> it for myself....
>>>> Everyone is a unique person, with his/her own needs, and preferences.....
>>>> And My M9 IS getting old.... and at some point will need to be
>> replaced...
>>>> Maybe, for me, putting out $6500 for a camera is not in the cards...
>> unless the M9 dies....
>>>> But I do like to keep abreast of what is out there, and why others
>> choose.....   Your inputs I find invaluable research info from someone I
>> respect.
>>>> Thank you
>>>>
>>>> Frank Filippone
>>>>
>>>> Red735i at verizon.net
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Frank - I like the fact there is no video, a larger eyepiece and much
>> better iso.
>>>> Gerry
>>>>>> What feature or features convinced you that THIS was the new camera for
>> you?
>>>>>> Frank Filippone
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Red735i at verizon.net
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I have just watched a couple of short videos on YouTube about the new
>> M10, and I want one. For the first time I have considered it is worth moving
>> from my M9. Now all I have to do is sell my body and as my daughter put it
>> once “as long as you sell it by weight you will be OK Dad”. Children can be
>> so rude!
>>>>>> Gerry
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Leica Users Group.
>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information