[Leica] Leica M9 CCD problem

Adam Bridge abridge at mac.com
Sat Aug 26 18:01:12 PDT 2017


I think the message is: things have changed. What you used to count appears to be seriously broken.

It doesn’t matter what Leica ONCE meant, it’s how the behave today. Right now it stinks of boutique and not pro. If the gear doesn’t have the stamina, and the company doesn’t stand behind it in a timely manner, then it’s not pro.

Adam


> On 2017 Aug  26, at 11:09 AM, Tina Manley <tmanley at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> You and me, too, Ted!  I've always used only Leicas professionally except
> for a few months when I had to have digital and Leica didn't have digital.
> I went with Canon and still hate to see those photos in my files.  I had 6
> M6's at one time and used them all.  I've only been using them 40 years
> instead of 65!
> 
> I've never had anything but the very best service from Leica in New Jersey
> and Germany.  They have expedited and over-night shipped to me when I
> needed something right away.  Any problem with any camera has been fixed or
> replaced to my satisfaction.  I've never regretted using only Leicas.
> 
> Tina
> 
> On Sat, Aug 26, 2017 at 1:38 PM, Ted Grant <tedgrant at shaw.ca> wrote:
> 
>> Howdy Crew,
>> This isn't about the M9, sort of? But all LEICA's. As I could no longer use
>> an M9? Even if I owned one  "or 3?" Along with my 3 motor driven LEICA
>> SLR's
>> as in the golden olden days OF MY CAREER!" However? All the chit chat about
>> this M9? A passing thought? TWO DAMN MANY TECHIE BITS!"
>> Well I must say I have always been a fan of LEICA!
>> 
>> Dr. Ted Grant O. C.
>> =====================================
>> 
>> 
> 
> -- 
> Tina Manley
> www.tinamanley.com
> tina-manley.artistwebsites.com
> http://www.alamy.com/stock-photography/3B49552F-90A0-4D0A-A11D-2175C937AA91/Tina+Manley.html
> 



More information about the LUG mailing list