[Leica] Process and scan to disc question

[Gerry Walden]

Nathan

Having looked at both jpeg and tiff in LR I can’t see what additional adjustments I can make.

Gerry

> On 17 Mar 2016, at 07:01, Nathan Wajsman <photo at frozenlight.eu> wrote:
> 
> As opposed to what, Gerry? JPG? The problem with JPG is that your possibilities for making adjustments in LR are limited. TIFF gives you more flexibility. JPG is a format that should be used for final output only.
> 
> Cheers,
> Nathan
> 
> Nathan Wajsman
> Alicante, Spain
> http://www.frozenlight.eu <http://www.frozenlight.eu/>
> http:// <http://www.greatpix.eu/>www.greatpix.eu
> PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws <http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws>Blog: http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/ <http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/>
> Cycling: http://www.crazyguyonabike.com/belgiangator <http://www.crazyguyonabike.com/belgiangator>
> YNWA
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>> On 17 Mar 2016, at 07:48, Gerry Walden <gerry.walden at icloud.com> wrote:
>> 
>> A number (Peter, Lluis etc) have mentioned scanning b&w as either .tiff or even .dng. I cannot see any obvious advantage to this, so could somebody pease enlighten me. I tried a couple to .dng which was a pain in Lightroom as they came out as negatives and the sliders worked the wrong way. I am currently scanning as .tiff but (to be honest) don’t really know why.
>> Thanks!
>> 
>> Gerry
>> 
>> 
>> Gerry Walden LRPS
>> www.gwpics.com
>> +44 (0)23 8046 3076 or
>> +44 (0)797 287 7932
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information