[Leica] Leica SL: Worst Camera of the Year?

[Richard Man]

I have shot ~30 rolls with the Hasselblad now, and almost rarely crop from
the square. Square is so good.

On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 11:09 AM, Bill Pearce <billcpearce at cox.net> wrote:

> Ah, this is depressing. For the first time Dr. Ted has disappointed me. I
> found the square format to be at the least interesting and at best superb.
> For the first year or so of 'blad ownership, I shot only for horizontal or
> vertical crops, and since most of what I shot was not for standard
> dimensions, it worked really well. Better to crop a nearly square part or a
> long narrow part out of 2 1/4 than 35. But after time, as I used it more
> and more for shooting for myself, I got to respect and understand the
> square, and some of my best stuff was printed full frame. And, in Dr.
> Teds's case, you can teach an old dog new tricks.
>
> AS for the rebadged Sony's, just silly. Although I could be interested in
> a fine hardwood grip for the 500CM or 500ELX.
>
> -----Original Message----- From: Richard Man
> Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2016 1:38 AM
> To: Leica Users Group
> Subject: Re: [Leica] Leica SL: Worst Camera of the Year?
>
> Indeed, those joke cameras were rebadged Sony digital cameras, sold for
> 7x-10x the prices, with the added wood grip and other non-sense features.
> At least it appears that the current Hasselblad corporate owner is no
> longer pursuing that brain-dead strategy.
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 11:16 PM, Ted Grant <tedgrant at shaw.ca> wrote:
>
> Hi Crew,
>> There wasn't, nor is there anything wrong with a Hasselblad if you are
>> using
>> the 2 1/4 120 film cameras. During part of my Leica life I also used 3
>> Hasselblad cameras when shooting for some clients and magazines. As the
>> Photo editor or the art directors called the shot on acceptable film size!
>> ERGO? If you wanted to do assignments for  their magazine you worked with
>> their size.
>> Now maybe what you lads are talking about is some "Mickey Mouse?" China
>> made
>> 35mm size badged Hasselblad that could well be a piece of copy-cat junk?
>>
>> But there isn't anything wrong, nor was there anything with a 2 1/4 120
>> film
>> size Hassie as they were a wonderful machine to work with. Only the odd
>> time
>> the 2 1/4  Sq.format was a bit of a pain in the ass!
>> cheers,
>> Dr. ted
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: LUG [mailto:lug-bounces+tedgrant=shaw.ca at leica-users.org] On Behalf
>> Of
>> Ken Carney
>> Sent: January-12-16 4:59 PM
>> To: Leica Users Group
>> Subject: Re: [Leica] Leica SL: Worst Camera of the Year?
>>
>> I thought Hasselblad's were good cameras? Used by the astronauts and all
>> that?
>>
>> On 1/12/2016 11:03 AM, Robert Baron wrote:
>> >
>> http://photorumors.com/2016/01/11/2015-worst-camera-of-the-year-vote-now/
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Leica Users Group.
>> > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>>
>> ---
>> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
>> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> // richard <http://www.richardmanphoto.com>
> // http://facebook.com/richardmanphoto
> // https://instagram.com/richardmanphoto
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>



-- 
// richard <http://www.richardmanphoto.com>
// http://facebook.com/richardmanphoto
// https://instagram.com/richardmanphoto