[Leica] Voightlander 1.5 or zeiss 2.0?

[Richard Man]

Zeiss, by far.

p.s. some of my best M9 photos were done at ISO 2000.....

On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 2:46 PM, Jim Nichols <jhnichols at lighttube.net>
wrote:

> It sure looks like they are close in performance and price.  It would
> depend on whether you like a lug-like grip on the focusing ring, or smaller
> grooves.
>
> There is one "not bad" review on the B&H site that you might like to read.
>
> Jim Nichols
> Tullahoma, TN USA
>
>
> On 9/16/2015 4:23 PM, Kyle Cassidy On The LUG wrote:
>
>> So I can get a voightlander 50 1.5 in m mount or the zeiss 50mm 2.0. Same
>> price. Which would you go with? I'm leaning toward the voightlander for the
>> extra stop because the m9 is useless above 400.....
>>
>> Thoughts?
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone plz excuse the typoss keyb0ard is reaLly small.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>



-- 
// richard <http://www.richardmanphoto.com>
// http://facebook.com/richardmanphoto
// https://instagram.com/richardmanphoto