[Leica] Comparing Summilux vs2 / Sonnetar

[Nathan Wajsman]

Fully agree. The Sonnetar bokeh in the last image is unpleasant. The Summilux is far superior in this regard. Actually, I had never heard of the Sonnetar and had to google it to find out what it is.

Un abrazo,
Nathan

Nathan Wajsman
Alicante, Spain
http://www.frozenlight.eu <http://www.frozenlight.eu/>
http:// <http://www.greatpix.eu/>www.greatpix.eu
PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws <http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws>Blog: http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/ <http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/>
Cycling: http://www.crazyguyonabike.com/belgiangator <http://www.crazyguyonabike.com/belgiangator>
YNWA













> On 18 Oct 2015, at 20:44, lluisripollphotography <lluisripollphotography at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> I have improved the original posted picture thanks to the advice of a friend (thank you Mike!), the two first are the improved and the original version. The third and fourth comparing Summilux and Sonnetar. In my opinion rendition are very similar and at least here I prefer the Lux, in my opinion the Sonnetar gives a bokeh not very nice when used at wide apertures.
> 
> <http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/Miscellaneous/20151015_L1009268+2.jpg.html>
> Leica MM, Sonnetar at f 1.1 (improved Burning)
> 
> <http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/Miscellaneous/20151015_L1009268.jpg.html>
> First posted Leica MM, Sonnetar at f 1.1 (will be deleted)
> 
> <http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/Miscellaneous/20151015_L1009283.jpg.html>
> Leica MM, Summilux 50 vs2 at f 1.4
> 
> <http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/Miscellaneous/20151015_L1009272.jpg.html>
> Leica MM, Sonnetar 50mm at f 1.4
> 
> Thanks for looking!
> 
> Saludos cordiales
> Lluis
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information