[Leica] (SPAM: ?) Re: If not Lightroom, ...

[RicCarter]

those are the pretty much the ONLY times

ric


> On Oct 14, 2015, at 1:38 PM, John McMaster <john at mcmaster.fr> wrote:
> 
> Oh yes, I use it for panoramas and layers, but for everyday photography?
> 
> john
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> 
> genuine answers:
> 
> panoramas
> 
> I like the crop tool that let’s me square up photos
> 
> 
> ric
> 
> 
> 
>> On Oct 14, 2015, at 1:10 PM, John McMaster <john at mcmaster.fr> wrote:
>> 
>> What do you do with your pictures in Photoshop that cannot be done in 
>> Lightroom? Genuine question.
>> 
>> I have used PS since early versions, looking at 2015 CC there is 
>> little comparison to earlier versions so why hark back to LR v1?
>> 
>> john
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> 
>> I do have Lightroom 1 since 2006 its still loaded on this computer and 
>> it was the second version which really made it viable for image 
>> processing  as well as browsing and organizing. The image manipulation 
>> stuff in this first version is very minimal a few tweaks and they told 
>> you up front you'd be for sure opening it in Photoshop with a touch of 
>> a button. I think it sold like hotcakes and plenty of people have no 
>> intention of opening their images up in anything if they really didn't 
>> have to and doing anything to them.  So Lightroom became the digital 
>> program for digital photography and they added the world "Photoshop" to
> it.
>> 
>> I asked a gal in a café sitting next to me if she used Photoshop. She 
>> said yes. She used LightRoom.
>> 
>> History of LightRoom:
>> 
>> http://www.mosaicarchive.com/2012/10/24/the-history-of-lightroom/
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On 10/14/15 11:25 AM, "Frank Dernie" <Frank.Dernie at btinternet.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> Not so Mark.
>>> 
>>> Even the first version of Lightroom had most of the photo-relevant 
>>> manipulation capabilities of the then current version of Photoshop.
>>> 
>>> It did have these functions organised differently, and added a 
>>> cataloging system suitable for photographers, but it was by no means 
>>> just
>> a browser.
>>> 
>>> Who told you that it was a browser with add-ons as an afterthought? 
>>> Somebody has been really pulling the wool!
>>> 
>>> cheers,
>>> Frank
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> On 14 Oct 2015, at 15:37, Mark Rabiner <mark at rabinergroup.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> As LightRoom was designed to be a browser which as an afterthought 
>>>> had some picture "editing" as in processing: cropping etc 
>>>> capabilities put in as an afterthought and then developed with later
>> versions.
>>>> 
>>>> Photoshop itself was first designed as a program to make it so you 
>>>> could change a Tiff file to a Jpeg or other file formats back and forth.
>>>> When you do that the image would sometimes darken or lighten.
>>>> So they had to put controls in there to tweak that.
>>>> Hence Photoshop. It had another name at first.
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information