[Leica] SL Review

[Sonny Carter]

Mine would include a much better live view solution, and an orientable rear screen.

from my iPad

Sonny Carter

> On Nov 18, 2015, at 8:52 PM, Richard Man <richard at richardmanphoto.com> wrote:
> 
> Not that I am Leica :-), but what are your criteria for a better-than-M240
> M?
> 
>> On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 6:03 PM, Robert Adler <rgacpa at gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Agree. And I'm hoping they will come out with a new M that will meet some
>> needs of mine currently not met...
>> 
>> On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 5:46 PM, Richard Man <richard at imagecraft.com>
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> Leica does not claim the SL as the M solution. Only that it can take M
>>> lens. For product sales, it makes a lot of sense to keep the lines
>> separate
>>> 
>>>> On Wednesday, November 18, 2015, Robert Adler <rgacpa at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> I decided to plop down the ~$35 for the Reid Reviews. I wanted to know
>>> how
>>>> my 35/2 performed on the SL. He tests that lens specifically as well
>> as a
>>>> few other wides.
>>>> As he asks not to "distribute that information", I can only say that,
>> as
>>> a
>>>> landscape photographer and one who also shoots below f/5.6 in other
>>>> situations, I am not the least bit interested in the SL anymore...
>>>> Best,
>>>> Bob
> -- 
> // richard <http://www.richardmanphoto.com>
> // http://facebook.com/richardmanphoto
> // https://instagram.com/richardmanphoto
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information