[Leica] New M(246) Outputs 12 bit Files
Steve Barbour
steve.barbour at gmail.com
Tue May 5 10:08:46 PDT 2015
> On May 5, 2015, at 10:05 AM, Robert Adler <rgacpa at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Perhaps that's what's meant by the Jono's statement that the elves in the
> Leica Labs "see" no difference...
> Not a very scientific approach as stated.
in other words, it's not worth the extra money....
(imagine if that's what leica buyers thought)
s
> Thanks Jayanand.
>
> On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 9:50 AM, Jayanand Govindaraj <jayanand at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> 12 bit = 2 raised to the power of 12 = 4096 shades of gray
>>
>> 14 bit = 2 raised to the power of 14 = 16384 shades of gray
>>
>> Quite a bit of tonal difference technically. Whether the human eye can
>> perceive it in a meaningful way in a print - who knows?
>>
>> Cheers
>> Jayanand
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 9:53 PM, Steve Barbour <steve.barbour at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>> On May 5, 2015, at 9:21 AM, Robert Adler <rgacpa at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I'm waiting to see what the explanation is. Going backwards in bit
>> depth
>>>> from the M(240) is perplexing. Perhaps their chip cannot handle 14bit
>>> depth
>>>> of pure gray as opposed to 4 different 14bit depth channels of RGGB
>>> (4x1x4
>>>> vs 4x4 all at once...).
>>>>
>>>> But I'm no EE, so I'm hoping other experts will jump in to explain what
>>> is
>>>> lost by going back to 12bit files.
>>>
>>> OR what is gained by going back to 12 bit files.
>>>
>>>
>>> s
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 9:16 AM, Jim Nichols <jhnichols at lighttube.net>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> It opened for me with no problem.
>>>>>
>>>>> Jim Nichols
>>>>> Tullahoma, TN USA
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 5/5/2015 10:58 AM, Tina Manley wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> This webpage is not available
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Tina
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 11:32 AM, Robert Adler <rgacpa at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> See post #46 by Jono Slack:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>
>> http://www.getdpi.com/forum/leica/54592-new-monochrom-fine-report.html#post639690
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Curiouser and curiouser...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Bob Adler
>>>>>>> www.robertadlerphotography.com
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> Leica Users Group.
>>>>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more
>> information
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Leica Users Group.
>>>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Leica Users Group.
>>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Bob Adler
>>>> www.robertadlerphotography.com
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Leica Users Group.
>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Leica Users Group.
>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Bob Adler
> www.robertadlerphotography.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
More information about the LUG
mailing list