[Leica] IMG: Bench At San Pedro Valley State Park

[Robert Adler]

and why is a basically 54x40 sensor more like a 645 than a 4x5??

On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 7:42 PM, Robert Adler <rgacpa at gmail.com> wrote:

> OK. My bad.
>
> The image was taken with an 80mm lens and a sensor that is 53.9mm X
> 40.4mm: I guess that's 645 format. It was also a stitch of two images that
> overlapped. The back was shifted 10mm to the left (exposing more on the
> image's right). So certainly not "normal" (not much about me is...). And
> the sensor was in portrait mode...
>
> That said, I'd love to have a table that shows what my lenses are in 35mm
> format with this sensor AND with 10mm shift and 20mm shift (both right and
> left shifts of 10mm). E.g., what's my 32mm lens in 35mm format terms
> unshifted, shifted 10mm and shifted 20mm?
>
> I have a 150, 80, 50 and 32... Anyone got an easy spreadsheet?
>
> So my apologies for the confusion, but I still like the image though the
> "perspective seems really strange"....
>
>  :-)
>
> On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 7:04 PM, George Lottermoser <
> george.imagist at icloud.com> wrote:
>
>> Yes. I agree Jim.
>>
>> Though 6" would be closer to 152 mm
>> than 127  mm
>>
>> 12" (300 mm) for 8x10
>> 8" (210 mm) for 5x7
>> 6" (150 mm) for 4x5
>> is what we thought of as "normal" in the good ole days
>>
>> a note off the iPad, George
>>
>> On Jul 9, 2015, at 7:17 PM, Jim Nichols <jhnichols at lighttube.net> wrote:
>>
>> > always considered "normal" for a 4x5 to be 6 inches, or, as many Speed
>> Graphics were equipped, 127mm.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Bob Adler
> www.robertadlerphotography.com
>



-- 
Bob Adler
www.robertadlerphotography.com