[Leica] IMG: Bench At San Pedro Valley State Park

[Robert Adler]

OK. My bad.

The image was taken with an 80mm lens and a sensor that is 53.9mm X 40.4mm:
I guess that's 645 format. It was also a stitch of two images that
overlapped. The back was shifted 10mm to the left (exposing more on the
image's right). So certainly not "normal" (not much about me is...). And
the sensor was in portrait mode...

That said, I'd love to have a table that shows what my lenses are in 35mm
format with this sensor AND with 10mm shift and 20mm shift (both right and
left shifts of 10mm). E.g., what's my 32mm lens in 35mm format terms
unshifted, shifted 10mm and shifted 20mm?

I have a 150, 80, 50 and 32... Anyone got an easy spreadsheet?

So my apologies for the confusion, but I still like the image though the
"perspective seems really strange"....

 :-)

On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 7:04 PM, George Lottermoser <
george.imagist at icloud.com> wrote:

> Yes. I agree Jim.
>
> Though 6" would be closer to 152 mm
> than 127  mm
>
> 12" (300 mm) for 8x10
> 8" (210 mm) for 5x7
> 6" (150 mm) for 4x5
> is what we thought of as "normal" in the good ole days
>
> a note off the iPad, George
>
> On Jul 9, 2015, at 7:17 PM, Jim Nichols <jhnichols at lighttube.net> wrote:
>
> > always considered "normal" for a 4x5 to be 6 inches, or, as many Speed
> Graphics were equipped, 127mm.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>



-- 
Bob Adler
www.robertadlerphotography.com