Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2021/09/30
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Yes, but for what they sell for on the used market, 90-280 looks even better. On Thu, 30 Sept 2021 at 02:01, John McMaster <john at mcmaster.co.uk> wrote: > The 70-180/2.8 is stunning.... > > john > > ?On 29/09/2021, 19:28, "LUG on behalf of Adam Bridge via LUG" > <lug-bounces+john=mcmaster.co.uk at leica-users.org on behalf of > lug at leica-users.org> wrote: > > Ewww?not a fan of push-pull lenses. I?ll look for an 80-200 I think. > > Much thanks! > > Adam > > > On 2021 Sep 29, at 10:52 AM, Frank Filippone via LUG < > lug at leica-users.org> wrote: > > > > This is a push-pull lens. > > > > I had one, hated the push pull function, and after testing it, sold > it. > > > > The sample I had was not terribly sharp. The80mm?200mm f/4 > Vario-Elmar-R is a significantly sharper lens. ( but more expensive) The > lenses without the ROM are cheaper. > > > > All of this on a Sony A7rii with Novoflex adapter. > > > > Frank Filippone > > BMWRed735i at gmail.com > > > > On 9/29/2021 9:50 AM, Adam Bridge via LUG wrote: > >> I?m looking at one of these as a nice lens for the SL2-S. > >> > >> Reasonable match? > >> > >> Is there a good on-line source for analysis of Leica glass? > >> > >> Adam Bridge > >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information -- Ken Iisaka first name at last name dot org or com