Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2021/09/29

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Thoughts on the Leica 70-210mm f4 Vario Elmar-R?
From: abridge at mac.com (Adam Bridge)
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2021 11:28:27 -0700
References: <701CE733-6B4D-4E42-A7A8-35167DDADFAF@mac.com> <35e3dd6b-a8af-3089-1be8-68b57753c1ab@gmail.com>

Ewww?not a fan of push-pull lenses. I?ll look for an 80-200 I think.

Much thanks!

Adam

> On 2021 Sep  29, at 10:52 AM, Frank Filippone via LUG <lug at 
> leica-users.org> wrote:
> 
> This is a push-pull lens.
> 
> I had one, hated the push pull function, and after testing it, sold it.
> 
> The sample I had was not terribly sharp.  The80mm?200mm f/4 Vario-Elmar-R 
> is a significantly sharper lens.  ( but more expensive)  The lenses 
> without the ROM are cheaper.
> 
> All of this on a Sony A7rii with Novoflex adapter.
> 
> Frank Filippone
> BMWRed735i at gmail.com
> 
> On 9/29/2021 9:50 AM, Adam Bridge via LUG wrote:
>> I?m looking at one of these as a nice lens for the SL2-S.
>> 
>> Reasonable match?
>> 
>> Is there a good on-line source for analysis of Leica glass?
>> 
>> Adam Bridge
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> Seehttp://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug  for more information
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



Replies: Reply from bmwred735i at gmail.com (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] Thoughts on the Leica 70-210mm f4 Vario Elmar-R?)
Reply from john at mcmaster.co.uk (John McMaster) ([Leica] Thoughts on the Leica 70-210mm f4 Vario Elmar-R?)
In reply to: Message from abridge at mac.com (Adam Bridge) ([Leica] Thoughts on the Leica 70-210mm f4 Vario Elmar-R?)
Message from bmwred735i at gmail.com (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] Thoughts on the Leica 70-210mm f4 Vario Elmar-R?)