Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2020/02/20
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I like the bokeh on torn jeans. Cheeers, Nathan Nathan Wajsman Alicante, Spain http://www.frozenlight.eu <http://www.frozenlight.eu/> http:// <http://www.greatpix.eu/>www.greatpix.eu PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws <http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws>Blog: http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/ <http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/> Cycling: http://www.crazyguyonabike.com/belgiangator <http://www.crazyguyonabike.com/belgiangator> YNWA "I?m not arguing, I?m just explaining why I?m right" > On 17 Feb 2020, at 14:03, Don Dory via LUG <lug at leica-users.org> wrote: > > Greetings to all. This weeks images are mostly to display how the Canon > 0.95 lens displays images. So first up is a more typical rendering from > this 60's lens. If you miss focus at all then you get haloing and > softness: > > http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/don_dory_gmail_com/Monday+Misc/perplexed+man.jpg.html > > However, if you nail the focus you get a pretty good image, finer detail > isn't there as on modern lenses but still quite acceptable: > > http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/don_dory_gmail_com/Monday+Misc/different+reactions+to+Cybermen+lecture.jpg.html > > Even near edge regions of focus render pretty well; there is some field > curvature but on cameras that let you focus off center that doesn't > present any problems: > > http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/don_dory_gmail_com/Monday+Misc/torn+jeans.jpg.html > > all the best. > > > -- > Don > don.dory at gmail.com > -- > Don > don.dory at gmail.com > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information