Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2018/12/28
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]For the Sony and M glass, I highly recommend the KoloriVision Ultra Thin cover glass modification. Ray angle is still an issue with some of the widest legacy M glass. The new 28 f/2 is outstanding on it. FWIW Paul www.PaulRoark.com On Fri, Dec 28, 2018 at 9:45 AM Bob Adler via LUG <lug at leica-users.org> wrote: > I?ve used both. Ended with Sony because of IBIS & crop able 50MP. Use all > my M lenses on it. Nice to use the 75/2 ! Though a lot of press on WAs > ?issues at the edges? on the Sony, I?ve shot the 35 ?lux with no real world > issues. I?ve used the 21/3.5 for star photos as light distortion at the > edges doesn?t usually matter. C1 has built in distortion and aberration > correction for both Fuji and Sony lenses. > > The 50/1.4 & 1.0 are ? black cat in coal mine? shooters. Do miss the range > finder capabilities, it that?s not so great, IMO, with Fuji. The native > Sony lenses are pretty great too. If you have grand kids, eye focus and > continual focus is terrific (or wildlife). > Hope this helps, > Bob > > Bob Adler > www.robertadlerphotography.com > > > On Dec 28, 2018, at 1:33 AM, Philippe via LUG <lug at leica-users.org> > wrote: > > > > Just about the fujis. > > > > Only one fuji has in body stabilization the XH x that Howard uses with > success btw > > > > OTT, if you happen to shoot video, the fuji is currently the one to beat. > > > > Else, having had and still using the XT series I like its ergonomics and > results, the native lenses and the versatility. High ISO is fine by my own > standards witht the XT-2, and contrary to AF, the XT-3 is no better in that > respect. > > What I like less is the changes I?ve had to get used to when processing > the files - the curve was long and winding as that famous road ? > counterintuitive after shooting other brands. But if this is you final > choice, feel free to ask for advice. > > > > Ogh yes, the JPEGs are impressive, most of the time. > > > > > > XT-2 samples > > ISO 6400 > > > http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Phileica/Noir+et+Blanc/Brehm-Cabinet-maker-0823.jpg.html > < > http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Phileica/Noir+et+Blanc/Brehm-Cabinet-maker-0823.jpg.html > > > > > > Colour > > > http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Phileica/Playground/LPP-11-11-2018-1542.jpg.html > < > http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Phileica/Playground/LPP-11-11-2018-1542.jpg.html > > > > > > Hope this may help you decide > > > > Amities > > > > Philippe > > > > > > > >> Le 28 d?c. 2018 ? 08:19, Aram Langhans via LUG <lug at leica-users.org> > >> a > ?crit : > >> > >> I was wondering what people who have these cameras think of them in > comparison to each other. I am thinking of the Sony a7 MIII and the Fuji > Xt series. > >> > >> Forget that there is a FF vs crop sensor difference. I understand that > issue. I am more interested in native optics, stabilization for legacy > glass, quality of output as far as color and low light, and EVF. > >> > >> Thanks. > >> > >> Aram > >> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Leica Users Group. > >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Leica Users Group. > > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information