Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2018/12/28
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Just about the fujis. Only one fuji has in body stabilization the XH x that Howard uses with success btw OTT, if you happen to shoot video, the fuji is currently the one to beat. Else, having had and still using the XT series I like its ergonomics and results, the native lenses and the versatility. High ISO is fine by my own standards witht the XT-2, and contrary to AF, the XT-3 is no better in that respect. What I like less is the changes I?ve had to get used to when processing the files - the curve was long and winding as that famous road ? counterintuitive after shooting other brands. But if this is you final choice, feel free to ask for advice. Ogh yes, the JPEGs are impressive, most of the time. XT-2 samples ISO 6400 http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Phileica/Noir+et+Blanc/Brehm-Cabinet-maker-0823.jpg.html <http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Phileica/Noir+et+Blanc/Brehm-Cabinet-maker-0823.jpg.html> Colour http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Phileica/Playground/LPP-11-11-2018-1542.jpg.html <http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Phileica/Playground/LPP-11-11-2018-1542.jpg.html> Hope this may help you decide Amities Philippe > Le 28 d?c. 2018 ? 08:19, Aram Langhans via LUG <lug at leica-users.org> a > ?crit : > > I was wondering what people who have these cameras think of them in > comparison to each other. I am thinking of the Sony a7 MIII and the Fuji > Xt series. > > Forget that there is a FF vs crop sensor difference. I understand that > issue. I am more interested in native optics, stabilization for legacy > glass, quality of output as far as color and low light, and EVF. > > Thanks. > > Aram > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information