Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2018/05/07
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Hi Tina, I agree with you absolutely! I many many years ago tried to shoot a nude or two! But I was always freaked out about doing them that I'd get in real trouble with my wife Irene. On top of that "my art photos" were about as interesting as a pile of bricks! Actually I think a pile of bricks would've been more interesting and exciting. :-) So I stuck to war, sports and the world over enjoying myself as you know! :-) cheers, Dr. ted :-) -----Original Message----- From: LUG [mailto:lug-bounces+tedgrant=shaw.ca at leica-users.org] On Behalf Of Tina Manley via LUG Sent: May-06-18 7:03 PM To: lug Cc: Tina Manley Subject: [Leica] Was Need printing paper advice, Now NUDITY From: Tina Manley <tmanley at gmail.com> Date: Sun, May 6, 2018 at 9:54 PM Subject: Re: [Leica] Need printing paper advice To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org> I'll claim a "Me, too" here and say that I do not appreciate any nudes which appear to take advantage of unwitting females for the sole purpose of exposing their bodies salaciously. Gratuitous nakedness for the purpose of arousal of one sex at the expense of the other, but claiming to be art, offends me. That said, I appreciate nudity as art, but not as pornography. Most of the nude photography I have seen on the internet falls under the category of "old, rich man with cameras taking advantage of poor, young girls with no clothes who think they will be famous models." On Facebook, the St. Petersburg Photographic Society photos are almost entirely in that category. I find them very offensive and demeaning to women. If the nudity is labeled as such, I will view it and make my own decisions as to whether or not to view more by that photographer. I do defend their right to post the photos and do not approve of censorship. Tina On Sun, May 6, 2018 at 4:36 PM, Ken Carney <kcarney1 at cox.net> wrote: > Richard, > > I have had very good results with the Epson Velvet Fine Art for a matte > paper, and Ilford Gold Mono Silk for glossy b&w (no idea why a particular > paper would be better for b&w, but I like it). Another excellent matte > paper is Hahnemuhle Torchon or most any of the Hahnemuhle papers for that > matter. The photo ink line on my Epson 3880 failed, so I've been > revisiting the matte papers. I'll order a new P800 anyway, but it has been > an eye-opener after printing only on gloss papers the last several years. > > Speaking of nudes, many years ago I joined a local photography club and it > had a "competition" night. In the spirit of things, I entered a b&w nude > from a class with Cole Weston. I was given one point out of five because > "nudes are not an appropriate subject for a photo club". In retrospect, > they were pretty awful. > > Ken > > > _______________________________________________ Leica Users Group. See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information