Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2016/03/17
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Nathan Having looked at both jpeg and tiff in LR I can?t see what additional adjustments I can make. Gerry > On 17 Mar 2016, at 07:01, Nathan Wajsman <photo at frozenlight.eu> wrote: > > As opposed to what, Gerry? JPG? The problem with JPG is that your > possibilities for making adjustments in LR are limited. TIFF gives you > more flexibility. JPG is a format that should be used for final output > only. > > Cheers, > Nathan > > Nathan Wajsman > Alicante, Spain > http://www.frozenlight.eu <http://www.frozenlight.eu/> > http:// <http://www.greatpix.eu/>www.greatpix.eu > PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws > <http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws>Blog: http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/ > <http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/> > Cycling: http://www.crazyguyonabike.com/belgiangator > <http://www.crazyguyonabike.com/belgiangator> > YNWA > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> On 17 Mar 2016, at 07:48, Gerry Walden <gerry.walden at icloud.com> wrote: >> >> A number (Peter, Lluis etc) have mentioned scanning b&w as either .tiff >> or even .dng. I cannot see any obvious advantage to this, so could >> somebody pease enlighten me. I tried a couple to .dng which was a pain in >> Lightroom as they came out as negatives and the sliders worked the wrong >> way. I am currently scanning as .tiff but (to be honest) don?t really >> know why. >> Thanks! >> >> Gerry >> >> >> Gerry Walden LRPS >> www.gwpics.com >> +44 (0)23 8046 3076 or >> +44 (0)797 287 7932 >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information