Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2016/03/17
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]As opposed to what, Gerry? JPG? The problem with JPG is that your possibilities for making adjustments in LR are limited. TIFF gives you more flexibility. JPG is a format that should be used for final output only. Cheers, Nathan Nathan Wajsman Alicante, Spain http://www.frozenlight.eu <http://www.frozenlight.eu/> http:// <http://www.greatpix.eu/>www.greatpix.eu PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws <http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws>Blog: http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/ <http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/> Cycling: http://www.crazyguyonabike.com/belgiangator <http://www.crazyguyonabike.com/belgiangator> YNWA > On 17 Mar 2016, at 07:48, Gerry Walden <gerry.walden at icloud.com> wrote: > > A number (Peter, Lluis etc) have mentioned scanning b&w as either .tiff or > even .dng. I cannot see any obvious advantage to this, so could somebody > pease enlighten me. I tried a couple to .dng which was a pain in Lightroom > as they came out as negatives and the sliders worked the wrong way. I am > currently scanning as .tiff but (to be honest) don?t really know why. > Thanks! > > Gerry > > > Gerry Walden LRPS > www.gwpics.com > +44 (0)23 8046 3076 or > +44 (0)797 287 7932 > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information