Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2016/03/10
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Hi Kyle, The 240 would be better on all counts except #1. I find it slower to wake up than the M9. Leo Wesson leowesson.com > On Mar 10, 2016, at 15:31, kyle cassidy <leicaslacker at gmail.com> wrote: > > I'm thinking about upgrading from the m9 to the 240 ... > > my main problems with the 9 are: > > 1) sloooow wakeup time. i'm often like "take the picture! take the > picture!" (mashes button, nothing happens, nothing happens ... bird flies > past ... long pause ... click!) > > 2) noisy iso -- anytying over 400 is almost useless > > 3) slow read time to the back of camera display > > 4) shutter is NOISY > > 5) slooow shutter winding time. > > my m9 is doing ... ok, but i'm wondering if the 240 is appreciably more > awesome. i don't care about sapphire crystals or titanium body parts or > snake skin covers or whatever... just the things that make the camera work > > thoughts? > > kc > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information