Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2016/03/10

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] m9 vs m240?
From: robertbaron1 at gmail.com (Robert Baron)
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2016 19:58:44 -0600
References: <CANiFQ-1O0-hzvh3-H0yziXkrxb9v8bTDxL_gBOvMLa1T26OB6w@mail.gmail.com> <2E58D7C7-376A-4BE9-89E4-602A68F42415@gmail.com>
 
I have found the wakeup time to be minimal if I am using very fast SD
cards......the speed of the card does make a difference I believe.

On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 3:41 PM, Leo Wesson <leowesson at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi  Kyle,
>
> The 240 would be better on all counts except #1.  I find it slower to wake
> up than the M9.
>
> Leo Wesson
> leowesson.com
>
>
>
In reply to: Message from leicaslacker at gmail.com (kyle cassidy) ([Leica] m9 vs m240?)
Message from leowesson at gmail.com (Leo Wesson) ([Leica] m9 vs m240?)