Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2016/02/11

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] IMGS: Tests with MM and M246
From: images at comporium.net (Tina Manley)
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2016 14:30:13 -0500
References: <CA+yJO1A2N2yntQ0J1OG8OQeg4qf1Dy3M-WqLpWnX4r__p_KL1Q@mail.gmail.com> <0ffc52dd9b674a55a08bd6e9e21faae6@WhizzEXM01.whizz.org> <CA+yJO1CJmrV+q7C1dSVgduAu=QA23MtjyouiQkfh4rYe1PmKeA@mail.gmail.com> <1455219065340.21876@mcmaster.fr>

They are to me.

Tina

On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 2:29 PM, John McMaster <john at mcmaster.fr> wrote:

> Waste of time then, they are your cameras but what you show are not
> worthwhile tests ;-)
>
> john
>
> ________________________________________
>
> As I have said before, I do not do controlled tests on tripods.  I do real
> life tests the way I would use the cameras.  Tripod tests would be of no
> use to me since I never use a tripod.  I hold the camera or prop it on the
> nearest post.  It works for me, maybe not for others.
>
> Tina
>
> On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 1:43 PM, John McMaster <john at mcmaster.fr> wrote:
>
> > Not on a tripod so hard to compare (viewpoint changes), look for tonality
> > differences at 320-1600asa as the 246 is better at +5000asa
> >
> > john
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> >
> > PESO:
> >
> > I did some tests with the Noctilux and Summilux on the MM and M246.  I
> > have a hard time telling the files apart.  I did notice that neither
> camera
> > records the aperture correctly because all of the photos were either shot
> > wide open or at F/8 and they were not recorded that way.  I also shot
> some
> > with both cameras at ISO 6400 but that was not recorded either. The M246
> > files are about half the size of the MM files.  These are the ones shot
> > with the 50/1.4:
> >
> > http://www.pbase.com/tinamanley/image/162551679
> >
> > and hit next until the end.  These have absolutely nothing done to them
> > except importing into LR as raw files and exporting to pBase as jpegs.
> I'll
> > post the Noctilux ones later.
> >
> > Tina
> >
> > --
> > Tina Manley
> > www.tinamanley.com
> > http://tina-manley.artistwebsites.com/
> >
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>



-- 
Tina Manley
http://
<http://t.sidekickopen35.com/e1t/c/5/f18dQhb0S7lC8dDMPbW2n0x6l2B9nMJN7t5XYgfmKYPW4WzBHl3Mx_9dW3LqWkM56dQ1Jf7P8b5b02?t=http%3A%2F%2Ftina-manley.artistwebsites.com%2F&si=6038418186567680&pi=7704bf71-2693-41cc-b626-4d6762dea2d5>
www.tinamanley.com
http://tina-manley.artistwebsites.com/


Replies: Reply from john at mcmaster.fr (John McMaster) ([Leica] IMGS: Tests with MM and M246)
In reply to: Message from images at comporium.net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] IMGS: Tests with MM and M246)
Message from john at mcmaster.fr (John McMaster) ([Leica] IMGS: Tests with MM and M246)
Message from images at comporium.net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] IMGS: Tests with MM and M246)
Message from john at mcmaster.fr (John McMaster) ([Leica] IMGS: Tests with MM and M246)