Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2016/02/11
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Not on a tripod so hard to compare (viewpoint changes), look for tonality differences at 320-1600asa as the 246 is better at +5000asa john -----Original Message----- PESO: I did some tests with the Noctilux and Summilux on the MM and M246. I have a hard time telling the files apart. I did notice that neither camera records the aperture correctly because all of the photos were either shot wide open or at F/8 and they were not recorded that way. I also shot some with both cameras at ISO 6400 but that was not recorded either. The M246 files are about half the size of the MM files. These are the ones shot with the 50/1.4: http://www.pbase.com/tinamanley/image/162551679 and hit next until the end. These have absolutely nothing done to them except importing into LR as raw files and exporting to pBase as jpegs. I'll post the Noctilux ones later. Tina -- Tina Manley www.tinamanley.com http://tina-manley.artistwebsites.com/