Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2015/10/27

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] The SL
From: alal at nyu.edu (Akhil Lal)
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2015 19:43:45 -0400
References: <27117471.1445962141242.JavaMail.root@elwamui-norfolk.atl.sa.earthlink.net> <CAGHtf7HioE0GZpm+JzmkrUWyhY6uwtz8+A1XhFboQvQCNadN8w@mail.gmail.com> <CAJCexzD6ma8Ao1DfvcZUWFGKjPJPqYWrzWPcMSmXj8nGUpck9g@mail.gmail.com> <CA+yJO1DVHpGGZNCKQT=32VNv_Lu7j1t=mQruR1KWGKg_kgmPxg@mail.gmail.com> <CAJ3Pgh51rLMJioj2+g6SY5Mpp8fx66T7nO9rR+a1501b_ya9CQ@mail.gmail.com>
 
I've not seen any reports on how well M wide angles perform on the SL.  Can
you elaborate?

On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 7:36 PM, Paul Roark <roark.paul at gmail.com> wrote:

> How it handles the M wides and even 50mm optics is a huge advantage over
> the Sony approach for those who have a good collection of M glass.
>
>
>
Replies: Reply from john at mcmaster.fr (John McMaster) ([Leica] The SL)
Reply from roark.paul at gmail.com (Paul Roark) ([Leica] The SL)
 In reply to: Message from wildlightphoto at earthlink.net (Doug Herr) ([Leica] The SL)
Message from geneduprey2015 at gmail.com (Gene Duprey) ([Leica] The SL)
Message from alal at nyu.edu (Akhil Lal) ([Leica] The SL)
Message from tmanley at gmail.com (Tina Manley) ([Leica] The SL)
Message from roark.paul at gmail.com (Paul Roark) ([Leica] The SL)