Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2015/10/28
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] The SL
From: john at mcmaster.fr (John McMaster)
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2015 09:53:28 +0100
References: <27117471.1445962141242.JavaMail.root@elwamui-norfolk.atl.sa.earthlink.net> <CAGHtf7HioE0GZpm+JzmkrUWyhY6uwtz8+A1XhFboQvQCNadN8w@mail.gmail.com> <CAJCexzD6ma8Ao1DfvcZUWFGKjPJPqYWrzWPcMSmXj8nGUpck9g@mail.gmail.com> <CA+yJO1DVHpGGZNCKQT=32VNv_Lu7j1t=mQruR1KWGKg_kgmPxg@mail.gmail.com> <CAJ3Pgh51rLMJioj2+g6SY5Mpp8fx66T7nO9rR+a1501b_ya9CQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAJCexzA6d1SDgiX22gjm+H6A0kDZ-u_mMbqFw_DkQ1Wa_rGpSg@mail.gmail.com>
Some M top line lenses used here (WATE, 28, 35, 50, 75)
http://www.getdpi.com/wp/2015/10/the-leica-sl/
john
-----Original Message-----
>From Akhil Lal
I've not seen any reports on how well M wide angles perform on the SL. Can
you elaborate?
On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 7:36 PM, Paul Roark <roark.paul at gmail.com> wrote:
> How it handles the M wides and even 50mm optics is a huge advantage
> over the Sony approach for those who have a good collection of M glass.
>
>
Replies:
Reply from cedric.agie at gmail.com (Cedric Agie) ([Leica] The SL)
In reply to:
Message from wildlightphoto at earthlink.net (Doug Herr) ([Leica] The SL)
Message from geneduprey2015 at gmail.com (Gene Duprey) ([Leica] The SL)
Message from alal at nyu.edu (Akhil Lal) ([Leica] The SL)
Message from tmanley at gmail.com (Tina Manley) ([Leica] The SL)
Message from roark.paul at gmail.com (Paul Roark) ([Leica] The SL)
Message from alal at nyu.edu (Akhil Lal) ([Leica] The SL)