Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2015/04/07
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Leaving everything else aside, digital gives you the equivalent of exposed film that you can process into the equivalent of a negative an infinite number of times - is that not advantage enough? :-) Cheers Jayanand On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 10:19 AM, Nathan Wajsman <photo at frozenlight.eu> wrote: > This one certainly applies to the Film Photography group on Facebook. They > seem to think that as long a photo is shot on film, it is Art. There are a > few good photographers there (like Michiel Fokkema) who keep me interested. > > Cheers, > Nathan > > Nathan Wajsman > > Alicante, Spain > http://www.frozenlight.eu > http://www.greatpix.eu > PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws > Blog: http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/ > > Cycling: http://www.crazyguyonabike.com/belgiangator > > YNWA > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 08 Apr 2015, at 05:25, Matt Kollasch <narbutta17 at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Film ? edgy dudes shoot on old-fashioned cellulose in the mistaken belief > > that it makes their photographs somehow more worthwhile than the average > > iPhone snap. > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >