Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2015/03/23
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I'm saying here Steve that when you shoot larger format you shoot less exposures and no one complains. On 3/23/15 6:12 AM, "Steve Barbour" <steve.barbour at gmail.com> wrote: > > > Sent from my iPhone > Steve Barbour > > On Mar 23, 2015, at 3:03 AM, Frank Dernie <Frank.Dernie at btinternet.com> > wrote: > > I have never heard of photographers considering their work by the acreage > of > film they use rather than the number of worthwhile results they get. Is > this > common? > > Good question, I am familiar with the idea..."it"s not what you shoot, it"s > what you show" and the usual tendency of photographers to underestimate the > number of frames they exposed,,, > > s > >> On 21 Mar, 2015, at 20:14, Mark Rabiner <mark at rabinergroup.com> wrote: >> >> A dozen sheets of 8x10 equal 144 shots with a Rolleiflex or Hasselblad. >> 432 shots with in 35mm. Also par for the course. A very common occurrence. >> >> I shot 10 rolls a pro pack of Delta 100 of one model once in a few hours. >> So I had 360 chances to get it right. >> That was the most concentrated I ever got. >> My Balcars afterwards were quite warm. But they cooled down in time. >> I needed a cold shower for sure. > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information -- Mark William Rabiner Photographer http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/